(Vatican Radio) Pope Francis is to celebrate daily Mass on Wednesday, 14 September for the French priest of Rouen, Fr. Jacques Hamel, who was murdered at the altar while celebrating Mass.
A statement released by the Holy See Press Office said the Mass is a sign of the Pope’s nearness to the relatives and friends of Fr. Hamel and to the community of Rouen, France.
Archbishop Dominque Lebrun of Rouen, along with 80 other pilgrims from the diocese, will participate in the suffrage Mass in the chapel of the Casa Santa Marta at 7 a.m. Rome time.
Fr. Hamel was slain by two Muslim migrants while celebrating Mass in the Church of Saint-Etienne-du-Rouvray on 26 July 2016.
The Mass will be broadcast live by the Vatican Television Station (CTV).
Click here to watch live.
(from Vatican Radio)…
(Vatican Radio) Pope Francis will take part in the final meeting of the World Day of Prayer for Peace when he travels to Assisi on Tuesday, 20 September.
The World Day of Prayer for Peace concludes a 3-day event organized by the Sant’Egidio Community entitled this year “Thirst of Peace. Religions and Cultures in Dialogue”. It will see the participation of over 450 religious leaders of different faiths gathered to pray for peace and strengthen dialogue in the spirit of Assisi.
The first “World Day of Prayer for Peace of Assisi” was held by Pope Saint John Paul II in October 1986 the first time such an event had occurred. Major religious leaders, including the Dalai Lama and the Archbishop of Canterbury, joined with the Pope to call for peace, unity, and interreligious understanding.
Saint John Paul II closed that meeting with the call “Let’s keep spreading the message of Peace and living the spirit of Assisi” and since then the community of Sant’Egidio has sought to fulfill that message by convening an annual meeting of religious leaders to discuss critical global issues of peace, unity, and interreligious dialogue.
Upon his arrival in Assisi, Pope Francis will be greeted by a group of faith leaders, including the Archbishop of Canterbury and the Ecumenical Patriarch Bartholomew. The day will include afternoon prayer in St Francis’ basilica and the Vatican has announced that the religious leaders will also meet “victims of war”.
The Pope will meet religious leaders and others individually including two Jewish and Muslim leaders and the event will conclude with a signing of an appeal for peace that will then be handed to children representing different parts of the globe.
As the Bishop of Assisi, Domenico Sorrentino explains to Vatican Radio’s Linda Bordoni , the event takes place in a historic moment for peace-building as we witness so many situations of war, terrorism and widespread violence:
Listen :
Bishop Sorrentino says the meeting is a great occasion to bring people together: “believers in all the religions together in this moment in which the world is facing big crises every day”.
And quoting Pope Francis he says a third world war is being fought piecemeal and he says this meeting is an occasion for grace.
“Because we are together not only to reflect, but also to pray, each one according to his own tradition. And we want to re-affirm the importance of faith, the importance of prayer, the importance of the grace of God if we really want to build a new world according to the values of God and of humanity based on peace” he says.
Bishop Sorrentino says that the city of Assisi bears a great responsibility as it is the city of Saint Francis, a city that is beloved across the world.
“We know that we must continue in his footsteps and in the footsteps of the Gospel” he says.
And he points out that it is the ‘way of Saint Francis’ to welcome all people, giving the testimony of Christianity which not only is solid in the faith but has the capacity to open its arms to everybody.
The Bishop says that Pope Francis’ obvious affection for the city of Assisi is a great joy for its inhabitants.
“Pope Francis who chose the name of Francis feels himself to be at home in Assisi” he says.
And Bishop Sorrentino recalls Saint Pope John II’s ‘prophetic’ intuition of 30 years ago and points out that just as Pope Benedict did, “Pope Francis comes to be in the footsteps of this prophecy”.
(from Vatican Radio)…
(Vatican Radio) Pope Francis says “an encounter with Jesus overcomes our indifference” and warned against bad habits that, even within a family, prevent us from truly listening to others and empathising with them. The Pope’s comments came during his homily at Tuesday’s Mass celebrated at the Santa Marta residence.
Taking his inspiration from the gospel reading where Jesus brought back from the dead the only son of a widow, Pope Francis lamented that often when people meet each other, “each of them is thinking of themselves, they can see the other person but are not looking at him or her, they can hear that person but are not listening to him or her.”
“An encounter is something different. It is what today’s Gospel proclaims to us: an encounter; an encounter between a man and a woman, between an only living son and an only son who had died; among a joyful crowd because they had encountered Jesus and were following him and a group of people, weeping, accompanying that woman, who had come out from the gate of the city; an encounter between the exit gate and the entry gate. The sheep fold. An encounter that makes us reflect on our way of interacting with each other.”
In the Gospel, the Pope continued, we read that Jesus “was moved with pity.” He pointed out that the pity felt by Christ is not the same as we have when going out in the streets, we see something sad (and say) ‘what a shame!’ Jesus doesn’t pass by, he is moved with pity. He goes up to the woman for a real encounter and then performs the miracle.
An encounter with Jesus overcomes indifference and restores dignity
In this gospel encounter, explained the Pope, we not only see his tenderness but also the fruitfulness of that encounter that restores people and things to their proper place.
“We are accustomed to a culture of indifference and we must strive and ask for the grace to create a culture of encounter, of a fruitful encounter, of an encounter that restores to each person his or her own dignity as a child of God, the dignity of a living person. We are accustomed to this indifference, when we see the disasters of this world or small things: ‘What a shame, poor people, look how they are suffering,’ and then we carry on. An encounter. And if I don’t look, it’s not enough to see, no, (we must) look – if I don’t stop, if I don’t look, if I don’t touch, if I don’t speak, I cannot have an encounter and I cannot help to build a culture of encounter.”
Within the family we must live a true encounter and at the table we must listen to each other
The message from today’s reading, said Pope Francis, stems from that encounter between Jesus and his people and we all are in need of his Word and need that encounter with Him.
“In our families, at the dinner table, how many times while eating, do people watch the TV or write messages on their cell phones. Each one is indifferent to that encounter. Even within the heart of society, which is the family, there is no encounter. May this help us to strive for this culture of encounter, just as simply as Jesus did so. Not just see but look. Not just hear but listen. Not just meet and pass by but stop. And don’t just say ‘what a shame, poor people,’ but allow ourselves to be moved by pity. And then draw near, touch and say in the language that comes to each one of us in that moment, the language of the heart: ‘Do not weep,’ and donate at the very least a drop of life.”
(from Vatican Radio)…
(Vatican Radio) Cardinal Peter Turkson, head of the Vatican’s new dicastery for the Promotion of Integral Human Development, gave the opening address on Tuesday at an international conference entitled ‘The Economy according to Pope Francis – a case study of social market economy’. The conference, held at Rome’s Pontifical University of the Holy Cross, was organised by the embassies of Austria, Germany and the Netherlands to the Holy See.
Philippa Hitchen reports:
The president of the Pontifical Justice and Peace Council, which will be incorporated into the new dicastery in January, explored Pope Francis’ call for financial leaders to move from a ‘liquid economy to a social economy’.
The cardinal spoke first about the problems of a liquid economy in which financial flows matter more than people, in which technical efficiency and productivity trump human dignity. This type of economic reasoning, he said, goes hand in hand with our prevailing “self-centred culture of instant gratification” in which people treat their fellow human beings—and indeed all of creation—as mere objects to be taken advantage of and then thrown away.
He contrasted that with the idea of a social economy which invests in people by creating jobs, providing training and working for the common good. Reflecting on the concepts of solidarity and subsidiarity, Cardinal Turkson said the encyclical ‘Laudato Si’ encourages us to expand our vision to include solidarity between generations, and even solidarity with creation itself.
Finally the cardinal spoke about the practical application of these principles to three areas: employment, inequality and environmental degradation. He concluded with an appeal to all those involved in decision making to play their part in prioritizing jobs over short-term profits, in respecting the environment by investing in sustainable development and by paying taxes, instead of exploiting globalization to maximize profits.
Please find below the full text of Cardinal Turkson’s address:
Pope Francis Questions the Economy
On behalf of the Pontifical Council for Justice and Peace, thank you for this initiative and invitation to raise questions, in the spirit of Pope Francis, about the economy.
In his 6 May address on receiving the Charlemagne Prize, the Holy Father called three times “for moving from a liquid economy to a social economy…
[This] would involve passing from an economy directed at revenue, profiting from speculation and lending at interest, to a social economy that invests in persons by creating jobs and providing training.”
In the light of Catholic social teaching, then, I would like to consider the contrast between:
i) The problem of the liquid economy; and
ii) The solution of a social economy.
And then I could sketch three challenges which such a move must confront, namely,
iii) Challenges facing any economy which wants to serve not itself but those who live in our common home
After this brief opening address, the other distinguished speakers will raise the question, “What is social market economy and what is the impact on Europe and globally?”
1. The problem: the liquid economy
When Pope Francis talks about a liquid economy, he calls it “an economy directed at revenue, profiting from speculation and lending at interest”. He means one in which financial flows are deemed paramount, in which technical efficiency and productivity trump human dignity and the ability of all to live flourishing lives. The financial bottom line is seen as more important than the human bottom line. Numbers matter more than people.
This is a theme Pope Francis has emphasized again and again, in Evangelii Gaudium, in Laudato Si’—and indeed in many homilies and extemporaneous remarks over the past few years. He repeatedly warns of the dangers of an economy of exclusion and inequality. Such an economy kills, he says. He goes on to ask: “How can it be that it is not a news item when an elderly homeless person dies of exposure, but it is news when the stock market loses two points?…Can we continue to stand by when food is thrown away while people are starving?” (EG 53).
As evidence, the Holy Father mentions “a ‘liquid’ economy that – in Italy, for example – results in young people under twenty-five not finding work: 40% of them.”
With strong adjectives and concrete examples, Pope Francis is laying out the moral defects of a liquid economy, one that refuses to put the human being at the centre of economic life. The problem stems from a “new idolatry of money”. “We have created new idols,” he says, “The worship of the ancient golden calf (cf. Ex 32:1-35) has returned in a new and ruthless guise in the idolatry of money and the dictatorship of an impersonal economy lacking a truly human purpose” (EG 55).
A real problem with the liquid economy is that it elevates the financial sector to a position whereby it rules rather than serves the real economy.
“The financial crisis of 2007-08 provided an opportunity to develop a new economy, more attentive to ethical principles and new ways of regulating speculative financial practices and virtual wealth. But the response to the crisis did not include rethinking the outdated criteria which continue to rule the world.” (LS 189)
For Pope Francis, a liquid economy goes hand-in-hand with a throwaway culture. This is the ultimate economy of exclusion: “those excluded are no longer society’s underside or its fringes or its disenfranchised – they are no longer even a part of it. The excluded are not the “exploited” but the outcast, the “leftovers” (EG 53).
In Laudato Si’, Pope Francis goes deeper into the roots of this throwaway culture: he points to a technocratic paradigm, a cult of unlimited human power, and “a relativism which sees everything as irrelevant unless it serves one’s own immediate interests” (LS 122). The technocratic paradigm, so dominant in our global economy today, invites people to think of economic intervention solely in terms of utility, productivity, and efficiency—negating any inherent dignity or value either in the human person or in creation. This is inherently confrontational, replacing virtues like care, compassion, and cooperation with an ethic of “possession, mastery and transformation” (LS 106). In turn, it leads to the idea of infinite or unlimited growth, a dominant idea in economics and finance, but ultimately “based on the lie that there is an infinite supply of the earth’s goods.” It leads to a “disordered desire to consume more than necessary” (LS 123). Profit maximization becomes the unquestioned economic motive, which contributes to both economic exclusion and environmental degradation. And it leads to practical relativism that gives absolute priority to immediate convenience and a “self-centred culture of instant gratification” (LS 162), which causes people to treat their fellow human beings—and indeed all of creation—as mere objects to be taken advantage of and then thrown away.
2. The solution: a social economy
What, then, is the solution? A social economy invests in persons by creating jobs and providing training. Pope Francis’ answer is that we need a different type of progress, one that is “healthier, more human, more social, more integral.” (LS 112).
Addressing the popular movements gathered in Santa Cruz de la Sierra in July 2015, the Pope argues that priority must shift from economic growth and financial health to human flourishing and the ability to “live well”—so that all people can “find meaning, a destiny, and to live with dignity.”
“A just economy must create the conditions for everyone to be able to enjoy a childhood without want, to develop their talents when young, to work with full rights during their active years and to enjoy a dignified retirement as they grow older. It is an economy where human beings, in harmony with nature, structure the entire system of production and distribution in such a way that the abilities and needs of each individual find suitable expression in social life.”
In the aftermath of the Second World War, the then social economy responded well to the particular challenges of its day. Likewise, we need a new social economy to meet the challenges of the present day, one in which the human being is firmly at the centre, where all are included in economic social life, and where creation is cherished and protected.
To make this vision a reality, a social economy would need to apply principles like solidarity, subsidiarity, and the common good to the challenges of the modern market economy.
Pope Francis argues that the idea of the common good is “a central and unifying principle of social ethics” (LS 156). For “underlying the principle of the common good is respect for the human person as such, endowed with basic and inalienable rights ordered to his or her integral development” (LS 157).
“In the present condition of global society, where injustices abound and growing numbers of people are deprived of basic human rights and considered expendable, the principle of the common good immediately becomes, logically and inevitably, a summons to solidarity and a preferential option for the poorest of our brothers and sisters” (LS 158).
In Evangelii Gaudium, Pope Francis expounded on this idea of solidarity. It “presumes the creation of a new mind-set which thinks in terms of community and the priority of the life of all over the appropriation of goods by a few” (EG 188). And it “must be lived as the decision to restore to the poor what belongs to them” (EG 189). Laudato Si’ presents us with an even more expansive notion of solidarity—solidarity within generations, solidarity between generations, and even solidarity with creation itself.
In Catholic social teaching, solidarity is always balanced by subsidiarity. Subsidiarity is concerned with identifying the right level of authority for undertaking decisions that affect the common good. It seeks to protect the freedom, initiative, and responsibility of lower levels, while making sure that higher levels (which tend to have the most power) provide proper assistance to these lower levels.
Subsidiarity “grants freedom to develop the capabilities present at every level of society, while also demanding a greater sense of responsibility for the common good from those who wield greater power” (LS 196). Of course, when it comes to global problems that do not respect national boundaries, the appropriate level of authority is the supranational level.
Climate change is an obvious example. The same is true for other environmental problems, including the loss of biodiversity; the strain on water supplies; and pollution of the air, the soil, the water. “Interdependence obliges us to think of one world with a common plan” (LS 164).
3. Three challenges
So far, I have critiqued the liquid economy and proposed the social economy in terms of principles. I would now like to focus on three practical implications of moving from a liquid to a social economy: (i) employment; (ii) inequality; (iii) climate change and environmental degradation.
Employment
It is no exaggeration to say that the world is going through a jobs crisis. According to the ILO, about 200 million people in the world are unemployed today. This includes about 70 million young people. We all know that unemployment has pernicious social consequences—it leads to worse health, lower educational attainment for children, and a loss of trust and social cohesion.
This is because employment is not just about earning one’s daily bread—it is actually an essential route to human flourishing and fulfilment, an essential source of human dignity. In the words of Pope Francis, “work is a necessity, part of the meaning of life on this earth, a path to growth, human development and personal fulfilment” (LS 128). He goes on: “It follows that, in the reality of today’s global society, it is essential that ‘we continue to prioritize the goal of access to steady employment for everyone,’ no matter the limited interests of business and dubious economic reasoning.” (LS 127)
What does the future hold in store? We are living through a period of immense technological advance, but this technology is raising some real problems for employment, especially for those with fewer skills. More and more people are being discarded as machines take up their tasks. And as technology gets more and more advanced, what will a “robot economy” mean for workers?
In Laudato Si’, Pope Francis warns about too much faith in the power of technology, because “immense technological development has not been accompanied by a development in human responsibility, values and conscience,” (LS 105). This is part and parcel of the throwaway culture.
This is why Pope Francis argues that when we replace workers with machines, we work against ourselves. “To stop investing in people, in order to gain greater short-term financial gain, is bad business for society,” he says (LS 128). To fully serve the common good, business is called upon to put the creation of employment ahead of a fixation of profits. This is essential to a social market economy and it is one of the areas where we really have lost our way as a society.
In the former social market economy, unions played a vital role. Catholic social teaching has always supported the right of workers to organize and bargain collectively, both on grounds of subsidiarity (they are an indispensable element of social life) and solidarity (they protect the just rights of workers vis-à-vis the owners of the means of production). Nowadays unions have lost a lot of power in this globalized economy. Perhaps part of the answer revolves around reinvigorated unions for the 21st century that look not only at wages and working conditions but also at “integral human development”—placing the world of work within the bigger perspective of human flourishing in all its aspects, in the civitas humana.
How we can involve our young people in this building project if we fail to offer them employment, dignified labour that lets them grow and develop through their handiwork, their intelligence and their abilities? How can we tell them that they are protagonists, when the levels of employment and underemployment of millions of young Europeans are continually rising? How can we avoid losing our young people, who end up going elsewhere in search of their dreams and a sense of belonging, because here, in their own countries, we don’t know how to offer them opportunities and values?
Inequality
Let me now turn to the second issue: inequality. The rise in inequality over the last 30 years has been stark. Oxfam now tells us that a mere 62 people own as much wealth as half of the world’s people.
There is a huge ongoing debate about the sources of inequality, which I will not get into. Suffice it to say that many economists point to technology and globalization as the main culprits. However, these trends will not be easily reversed, and it is hard to argue that they should be. Technology has brought great benefits. The fact that hundreds of millions of people have been lifted out of poverty in countries like China and India, thanks to their integration into the global economy, is certainly positive
The real problem is that government policies, instead of trying to dull the edges of inequality driven by these economic forces, actually made it worse. I am thinking here of policies like tax cuts for the wealthy and financial deregulation on one side, and fraying social safety nets and weakening unions on the other. A contributing factor, as many economists have pointed out, is that inequality gives the wealthy too much influence over policy. This is an insight that goes back to Aristotle.
Why is inequality so bad? Some economists argue that it is natural and healthy, the inevitable outcome of a competitive market economy. In recent years, however, there seems to be more and more evidence that excessive inequality is bad for economic growth, bad for economic opportunity, bad for financial stability, and bad for trust and social cohesion. I actually think there is even a deeper reason why inequality is harmful. Adam Smith might be most famous as the intellectual godfather of the free market, but he also had a profound insight that inequality undermines virtue because it leads people to admire wealth, prestige, and privilege—and to disdain the poor.
Pope Francis connects these dots, tying together inequality, the economy of exclusion, and the pathologies of the throwaway culture. Ultimately, he suggests that inequality spawns violence and destroys peace: “This is not the case simply because inequality provokes a violent reaction from those excluded from the system, but because the socioeconomic system is unjust at its root,” he says (EG 59).
A further point is that when societies become too unequal, they lose a sense of shared purpose necessary for deliberating on the common good. This glue of “civic virtue” was an important reason why the original social market economy proved so successful. To solve today’s problems, we need a new injection of civic virtue—and this in turn means taking inequality seriously and doing what we can to combat it. After all, Pope Francis calls inequality the “root of social ills” (EG 202).
Environment
Let me now turn to my third and final example: environmental degradation.
The former social market economy was very much based on old-school industrialization—powered by oil, coal, and gas. Given the effects of economic activity on the planet, this is no longer viable. This is indeed a major theme of Laudato Si’: the old economic model is leading to extreme pollution, runaway climate change, severe water stress, a destruction of biodiversity and vital ecosystems—overall, a legacy of “debris, desolation and filth” (LS 161). “Never have we so hurt and mistreated our common home as we have in the last two hundred years,” says Pope Francis (LS 53).
As the Pope noted so simply and poignantly in his recent Message for the World Day of Prayer for the Care of Creation: “When we mistreat nature, we also mistreat human beings” —especially the poor and vulnerable. These are the people least responsible for the ecological crisis, and yet who are most affected by it—because their livelihoods are most at risk and because they lack the resources available to others to cushion themselves. The World Bank estimates that climate change alone will push 100 million people into extreme poverty by 2030, if we fail to act.
A new social economy, therefore, needs to do a better job of respecting nature. It needs to be built, not on fossil fuels, but on renewable energy. As Pope Francis said in Laudato Si’, “technology based on the use of highly polluting fossil fuels – especially coal, but also oil and, to a lesser degree, gas – needs to be progressively replaced without delay” (LS 165). This is why last year’s Paris Agreement on climate change—endorsed by 196 countries and pledging to peak greenhouse gas emissions as soon as possible, with the goal of moving to net-zero carbon emissions in the second half of the century—is so important. It is indeed the foundation of a new social market economy. I am glad to see that both China and the United States have recently announced signing onto the Agreement, and I encourage other countries to follow without delay.
A complete shift from fossil fuels to renewables by 2070 or thereabouts will not be easy. To put things in perspective, though, neither was rebuilding Europe after World War II! It took heroic effort, and it brought out humanity’s best. We need that kind of heroic effort once again: to harness the virtues that propelled the original social market economy—but on a global scale. This includes coming to grips with climate change and achieving sustainable agriculture, plus efforts to make sure that all have access to food, healthcare, education, clean water, clean energy, and communications.
A 21st century social economy must not only prioritize solidarity and subsidiarity—but also sustainability, equality, and human dignity.
Conclusion
To conclude, then, let me say that finding solutions to these challenges and building a social economy requires all stakeholders to take responsibility and play their part. Let’s not fall into the trap of assuming that the state alone is responsible for the common good while “the business of business is business”.
Under the original social market economy, business accepted its social responsibility, its duty to the common good. It realized that it was beholden to a wider array of stakeholders than shareholders alone—this was especially notable in Germany. This ethos needs to be restored and reinvigorated. This is how business can live up to its calling as (in the words of Pope Francis) a “noble vocation”. How might it accomplish that today? By prioritizing jobs over short-term profits; by respecting the environment and investing in sustainable development; by paying its workers well and paying its fair share of taxes, instead of exploiting globalization to once again maximize profits.
May I end with a parable? It starts, “A man was going down Jerusalem to Jericho, and fell into the hands of robbers, who stripped him, beat him, and went away, leaving him half dead.” The first two passers-by evidently had more important business to attend to.
But now, with Laudato Si’, let us identify the victim as all who are in social or environmental peril and those likely to fall into such dangers in our lifetimes; and let us identify the ones who pass by as too preoccupied with banking and business, commerce and technology, governmental and political affairs …
The original parable continued, “A Samaritan while travelling came near him; and when he saw him, he was moved with pity”. In our update, the Samaritan represents all those whose compassion leads them to displace their previous priorities and make the great social and environmental perils of our day their first concern ….
At the end, Jesus said to his questioner and to us, “Go and do likewise.”
(from Vatican Radio)…
(Vatican Radio) The Pontifical Commission for the Protection of Minors (PCPM) met in Plenary Assembly last week, September 8-11 focusing their attention on the three key areas of education, a Day of Prayer and the Holy Father’s MOTU PROPRIO “As a Loving Mother”, on the accountability of Church leadership. The Plenary also recognised the importance of digital technology and have announced the Pontifical Commission for the Protection of Minors will be going live with its own website.
The Working Group meetings focused on the updates for current projects, and developing draft proposals for Pope Francis.
Lydia O’Kane spoke to Commission member Gabriel Dy-Liacco from the Philippines about the Commissions work.
Listen:
Please find below the full press statement from the Commission:
The Pontifical Commission for the Protection of Minors [PCPM] works throughout the year and came together in Rome from September 5 through 11 for a week of Working Group meetings, [Guidelines, Healing and Care, Education, Formation, Theology and Spirituality, Canonical and Civil Norms] and for its Plenary Assembly.
The Working Group meetings focused on the updates for current projects, and developing draft proposals for the Holy Father, Pope Francis. For example, the Commission has developed a template for guidelines in the safeguarding and protection of children, adolescents and vulnerable adults, which we will shortly present to the Holy Father for his consideration.
Education is key
Highlights of this Plenary Assembly were the members’ reports on the progress of on-going education programs, both at a local level and in the Vatican.
These initiatives are part of the Commission’s effort to be of service to the Holy Father by placing their expertise at the disposition of local churches and church leaders. Commission members have also been invited to give talks and take part in various conferences and workshops on all five continents.
These include: talks and workshops held in Australia, in the Archdiocese of Melbourne; in South Africa (SACBC), an orientation program for New Missionaries; in the Philippines [CBCP], a workshop for the Archdiocese of Manila; in Colombia, a talk with clergy of the Archdiocese of Bogotá, a workshop with religious communities, workshops with the Major Seminary and a workshop with evangelization leaders; USA, a talk with “United States National Safe Environment and Victims Assistance Coordinators”; a workshop in Fiji; in New Zealand a series of talks and workshops with the bishops and religious leaders; in Ghana a meeting with the secretary generals of the Symposium of Episcopal Conferences of Africa and Madagascar from the Association of [SECAM]; a meeting in Tanzania with child protection practitioners from the Association of Member Episcopal Conferences in Eastern Africa [AMECEA] in Argentina, a discussion with seminarians and clergy of the Diocese of Moron, Buenos Aires; In Santo Domingo, a meeting with fifty formators from thirteen different nations belonging to the Council of Latin American Bishops Conferences [CELAM]; a meeting with Bishops and canonists of Slovakia and Czech Republic; in Italy, a seminar for Abbots of the Benedictine Confederation and participation in the Anglophone Safeguarding Conference.
In the context of the Vatican, Commission members were invited to address meetings of the Pontifical Ecclesiastic Academy and the Congregation for Consecrated Life.
In the coming week members have also been invited to address the training for new bishops held by the Congregation for the Evangelization of Peoples, a meeting of the Congregation for the Clergy and the training for new Bishops held by the Congregation for bishops.
Other education programs planned in the coming months include workshops in Mexico, Ecuador and with the Colombian Bishops Conference. The Commission has also been asked to address the Conference of Major Superiors of Men in the US and to hold a workshop for the Federation of Asian Bishops Conferences [FABC].
Day of Prayer
A survivor of clerical child sexual abuse made the proposal of a Day of Prayer to the Commission. The Commission believes that prayer is one part of the healing process for survivors and the community of believers. Public prayer is also an important way of consciousness raising in the Church.
The Holy Father has requested that National Bishops Conferences choose an appropriate day on which to pray for the survivors and victims of sexual abuse as part of a Universal Day of Prayer initiative.
The Commission was happy to learn that many Bishops Conferences have already taken steps to enact the proposal.
We were informed that in Australia, the Church throughout the country marked the Day of Prayer on Sunday September 11, in conjunction with their National Day for Child Protection.
The Bishops of the Philippines have already begun to discuss how best to implement the Day of Prayer and will soon announce a date.
The Southern African Bishops Conferences [SACBC] have embraced the proposal dedicating three days to the initiative from Friday December 2 to Sunday December 4., the second Sunday of Advent. Friday will be observed as a day of fasting, there will be a penitential vigil on Saturday and on Sunday a statement prepared by the SACBC, will be read out in all parishes.
The PCPM has prepared resources and materials for the Universal Day of Prayer and we are happy to make them available on request.
MOTU PROPRIO “As a Loving Mother”
The Holy Father’s motu proprio “As a Loving Mother” was discussed. Accountability in dealing with the scandal of child sexual abuse by clergy has been a major concern for the Commission from the outset. In February 2015, the Commission made a proposal to the Holy Father regarding bishop accountability. In “As a Loving Mother”, Pope Francis goes beyond the accountability of bishops broadening it to other Church leaders. The Commission has welcomed this.
Coming soon the PCPM Website
Our presence in the digital world is seen as key to furthering the Commission’s efforts to collaborate with local Churches and disseminate the importance of the protection and safeguarding of minors and vulnerable adults. In the coming months the Pontifical Commission for the Protection of Minors will be going live with its own website. It is also our hope that it will be a useful resource for the Church and all people of good will in our common goal, which is to make our Church and our society a safe home for all.
The Pontifical Commission for the Protection of Minors was created by Pope Francis in March of 2014. The Chirograph of His Holiness Pope Francis states specifically, “The Commission’s specific task is to propose to me the most opportune initiatives for protecting minors and vulnerable adults, in order that we may do everything possible to ensure that crimes such as those which have occurred are no longer repeated in the Church. The Commission is to promote local responsibility in the particular Churches, uniting their efforts to those of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, for the protection of all children and vulnerable adults.”
(from Vatican Radio)…